<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ColdFusion MX works with Java&#8230; if you have money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrispetersweb.com/2006/08/03/coldfusion-mx-works-with-java-if-you-have-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrispetersweb.com/2006/08/03/coldfusion-mx-works-with-java-if-you-have-money/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Mastroianni</title>
		<link>http://www.chrispetersweb.com/2006/08/03/coldfusion-mx-works-with-java-if-you-have-money/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Mastroianni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 13:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://208.112.67.4/blog/accessibility/coldfusion-mx-works-with-java-if-you-have-money#comment-5</guid>
		<description>A few months back I was working with some Java boys trying to integrate a custom jar. They were using a newer version of log4j then the one CF ships with. We never got it running. That wasn't the only confilct but it's definitely the first one that comesto mind. We tried updating the CF log4j library and then the server wouldn't start.

Personally I think true CF and Java integration is a nice dream but it's a lot more trouble then it's worth.9/1/06 9:54 AM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few months back I was working with some Java boys trying to integrate a custom jar. They were using a newer version of log4j then the one CF ships with. We never got it running. That wasn&#8217;t the only confilct but it&#8217;s definitely the first one that comesto mind. We tried updating the CF log4j library and then the server wouldn&#8217;t start.</p>
<p>Personally I think true CF and Java integration is a nice dream but it&#8217;s a lot more trouble then it&#8217;s worth.9/1/06 9:54 AM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
